Note:
During the nearly three years he was in
office President John Kennedy
underwent a remarkable metamorphosis. In his masterful book, “JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and
Why It Matters” author James Douglas does an expert job of
chronicling the events Kennedy experienced and which precipitated this change.
Of all the books I know of on the Kennedy years and his assassination Douglas’s
book and L. Fletcher Prouty’s
excellent “JFK: The CIA, Vietnam and the
Plot to Assassinate John F. Kennedy”
are the two best and most important. They both are meticulously researched and
documented. Most of the material for this series of articles comes from these
books and for the full story you must read them. It has been 50 years since
these events have taken place. Revisionists have had their way with the
histories of those times. Most young people I have talked to are woefully
ignorant of the true facts of this history and in their computer and video game
world are never likely to find out. Even most of those of my generation, who
actually lived through these times, do not know the truth behind the influences
that have shaped their lives and which in many ways shaped the nation we have
today; a nation that is in serious
danger of losing forever our precious heritage of freedom. It is my hope
that illuminating the truth will douse the mystery and put people into action
in present time. If enough people are challenged fast enough there is still
time to save the United States. MA
A
|
![]() |
JFK |
t the time of his election in 1960 John
F. Kennedy was a committed Cold Warrior. In his January, 1961 inaugural
address he acknowledged as much when he said: “…let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall
pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose
any foe to assure the survival and success of liberty.” In the bellicose,
anti-communist days of the early ‘60s we all knew that comment was directed at
the Soviet Union. JFK knew it too.
Over the next two and a half years, however, Kennedy would make a sea change and
in all likelihood would have brought about a sea change for the nation had he
not been assassinated. Subtly at first, and then more markedly as his administration
progressed through 1962 and into 1963, Kennedy made the turn toward a policy of
peaceful co-existence with the Soviet Union and away from the “Report from Iron Mountain” idea that a
nation’s war powers provided its governmental means of control over its
population as well as its economic well being. (For information on “Report from Iron Mountain” please see my earlier blog in this series “Some
Comments on War...”) It was this change
and the promise that it held for changing the nation that got JFK killed. The military-intelligence-industrial complex
and those above it pulling its strings would not allow the Kennedy sought
change toward peace to occur.
As
discussed in earlier blogs in this series, John Kennedy’s presidential rocking
chair was hardly warm when he was hit with the first major crisis of his
administration; the CIA caused
disaster at the Bay of Pigs in Cuba
in April, 1961. (Due to a bad back JFK would often sit in a rocking chair.) As
noted in those writings, though he took responsibility for the Bay of Pigs debacle
publicly, privately he felt he had been lied to and misled by the CIA. The
handlings he took to depower the CIA included firing the Director and Deputy
Director (Allen Dulles and Charles Cabell) and the issuing of National Security Action Memorandum
(NSAM) #55 to the Joint Chiefs of Staff
in which he directed that they would be as responsible for advice to him in
Cold War operations as in regular wartime operations, thus signaling to the CIA
the intent to curtail their covert operation powers. In addition to these
already noted actions he also fired Richard
Bissell, who as Deputy Director for
Plans ran the Bay of Pigs operation and was, for practical purposes, the
number three man at the CIA. He also cut the CIA’s budget and issued orders to
all the U.S. embassies around the world that he held the U.S. Ambassador to
each nation responsible for the actions by all U.S. personnel in his zone. This
effectively put the U.S. Ambassador to any country senior to any CIA personnel
and operations within that country with power over them. Needless to say, the
CIA did not like these efforts at control and as a result a major schism
developed between the President and his intelligence community.
Following
the Bay of Pigs through to the end of 1962 Kennedy negotiated his way through
an obstacle course of one crisis after another, starting first with the
Southeast Asian country of Laos (situated
just to the west of Vietnam), then Berlin and finally the Cuban Missile Crisis in October of 1962.
Looming over all of these was the specter of Vietnam, which from 1954 on was being built up by the CIA and would
ultimately become the next major armed conflict in the Cold War. Had Kennedy
lived Vietnam never would have happened, and therein is the key to his
assassination. Because of this fact his death was a major turning point for the
nation, which can now be clearly seen in retrospect. To appreciate the
magnitude of this turning point, ask yourself these questions:
“What
if the Vietnam War had never happened? What if the 58,000 Americans who died
there went on to live out their lives? What if, by some estimates, the nearly 2
million Vietnamese killed through the Vietnam War were never killed? What if
the nearly $500 billion (in 1960s dollars) spent on the Vietnam War was never
spent and what if the social upheaval in the United States that occurred in the
late ‘60s and early ‘70s as a result of the war never took place?”
Ask yourself these questions and try to
envision the answers. Do so and you will start to have an appreciation of just
what occurred in Dallas on November 22nd, 1963 when President
Kennedy was killed. Revisionist historians have tried to obscure the truth,
claiming that JFK is the President who got us into Vietnam. As we walk through
the events leading to Kennedy’s murder in Dallas draw your own
conclusions.
During
the First Indochina War, in 1951, ten years before he was elected President and
at the time a congressman, John F. Kennedy took a trip to Vietnam with his
brother Robert. You will recall that after World War II the French were trying
to re-assert their control over their former colony. They were being opposed in
this effort by Hoh Chi Minh and his
army, the Viet Minh, who were
fighting for Vietnamese control of their homeland. During the trip Kennedy
spoke to the French commander, who had over 250,000 troops at his disposal. The
French commander told JFK that with this overwhelming force there was no way he
could lose to the Viet Minh. On this trip Kennedy also spoke to a friend of
his, a man named Edmund Gullion, who
at the time was an official at the U.S. consulate. Gullion told Kennedy the
exact opposite:
![]() |
Edmund Gullion |
“We’re
going nowhere out here”, he said. “The
French have lost. If we come in here and
do the same thing, we will lose, too, for the same reason. There’s no will or
support for this kind of war back in Paris. The home front is lost. The same
thing would happen to us.”
Spoken 3 years before the devastating
French defeat at the battle of Dien Bien
Phu, Gullion’s words take on a kind of prophetic air. Kennedy never forgot
them.
This
partially explains why, though at the beginning of his term he was as dedicated
an anti-communist as any of his intelligence or military men, Kennedy would
never commit U.S. ground troops to action in any of the crises he handled,
despite the pressure brought from the CIA
or the Joint Chiefs of Staff to do
so. In addition he was acutely aware of the threat posed by a possible nuclear
exchange with the Soviet Union and what this would mean for mankind. In
September of 1961 he revealed this concern in an address to the United Nations when he stated:
“Today,
every inhabitant of this planet must contemplate the day when this planet may
no longer be habitable. Every man, woman and child lives under a nuclear sword
of Damocles, hanging by the slenderest of threads, capable of being cut at any
moment by accident, or miscalculation, or by madness. The weapons of war must
be abolished before they abolish us.”
For these reasons, time and again when
faced with a crisis, with his military and intelligence men demanding that he
commit U.S. forces to action, Kennedy would find a way out and not do it. The
pattern, as we shall see, is unmistakable. It manifested in the Bay of Pigs debacle when he refused to
release U.S. forces to salvage the CIA’s battered brigade on the Cuban beaches
and it would manifest several more times through the next two years. It was a
pattern that would cost him his life.
To be continued…
Copyright ©
2013
By Mark Arnold
All Rights
Reserved
Wow! It makes so much sense... long term survival concepts JFK had integrity about vs the suppressive forces we as a people had little inkling of.
ReplyDeleteThanks Steve! JFK was a complex figure, very sane in the area of foreign policy, good grasp of the international scene, dedicated to keeping the U.S. out of a ground war in Asia that he knew could not be won, and as a result made a lot of enemies in the "national security state"...and at the same time and absolute idiot on his second dynamic with multiple affairs and liaisons, that same integrity you speak of was no where to be found in his personal life...because of this the guy was brilliant but flawed. In this series am only concentrating on the factors regarding the incidents leading to his assassination because it was such a major turning point for the nation. MA
ReplyDelete